“If there is no budget by
June 30, will Virginia’s public schools shut down?” This is the $7 billion
dollar a year question. To my knowledge we will be entering uncharted
territory. If a budget is not adopted
by July 1, the Governor has said publicly that he will not allow the government
to shut down. His authority to keep the
government going will surely be questioned.
I can't find much in the Constitution of Virginia to grant the Governor spending
authority beyond December 11, 2014.
However, Code provisions appear to empower the Governor.
The period of July 1
through December 11st is covered by Article X, Section 7:
No money shall be paid out of the State treasury except in
pursuance of appropriations made by law; and no such appropriation shall be
made which is payable more than two years and six months after the end of
the session of the General Assembly at which the law is enacted authorizing the
same.
This passage is certainly
subject to interpretation. If the budget
bill references two years, is the Constitutional language relevant? If so,
when does the 30 month span begin?
Delegate Bob Marshall, who is an astute scholar of the Virginia
Constitution, asserts that it begins on June 11, 2012, when the General
Assembly last amended and the Governor signed the biennial budget bill. Could this provision, intended to allow the
payment of invoices still outstanding, be used to fund the government at the
level established by the 2012-14 biennial budget until December 11?
If a 2014-2016 budget is
not enacted prior to December 11, our focus shifts to other portions of the
law. The second sentence in Article V,
Section 7 reads as follows:
The Governor shall be commander-in-chief of the armed
forces of the Commonwealth and shall have power to embody such forces to repel
invasion, suppress insurrection, and enforce the execution of the laws.
This section of the Code
of Virginia is also relevant (§ 44-146.17.):
(7) Whenever, in the opinion of the Governor, the
safety and welfare of the people of the Commonwealth require the exercise of
emergency measures due to a threatened or actual disaster, he may declare a
state of emergency to exist;
Up to this time
conventional wisdom has been that his power would allow the Governor to keep
governmental operations related to public safety in operation, such as police
protection and continued operation of the jails. However, the cessation of services such as
foster care, support services to the disabled, public hospitals, public
education, and road repairs are just a few examples of what could be viewed as
an emergency.
Would the Governor cite
"the execution of laws," and, for example, say that the Standards of
Quality are laws enabling him to keep the schools running under the funding
level of the previous budget? Would he
declare a state of emergency? In either
case, the Attorney General will likely be asked to weigh in, and this would then
head to court, as members of the legislative branch would assert that only
funds which are appropriated can be spent.
If the court were to side
with the Governor, the ruling could take the pressure off of future
legislatures to produce budgets on time.
If the court were to side with the legislature, we'd have at least a
partial shutdown. I'm sure the courts
would specify that the operation of jails and law enforcement would continue.
The specter of this issue
appearing before the court would certainly put great pressure on the General Assembly
to act. We would be in a Constitutional
crisis, and the court's ruling might alter the balance of power between the three
branches of government. It would be
extremely unwise for the legislature to sit back and take this risk.
School boards could try to keep
things going in the short-run with local funding - this may be easier for
Alexandria compared with Lee County.
Local governments can pass a budget without having all the cash on hand,
and the decisions regarding appropriations obviously will affect the ability of
the school board to keep schools going.
We should keep our ears to
the ground on this, but if anybody other than a Virginia Supreme Court justice
tells you with certainty that they know what will happen, should this issue
come their way, take it with a grain of salt.